Yet more on the paid and fake reviews uproar

The uproar that the true secret behind John Locke’s remarkable e-book sales was that Locke paid for reviews is still going on. I already blogged about the paid reviews scandal and what remains of John Locke’s advice one year later here and here.

The New York Times, which broke the story, has a follow-up which focus on fake reviews not just for books but for all sorts of consumer products. The New York Times seems to consider the fake reviews for consumer products even worse than the fake book reviews. I’m the opposite, since I expect book reviews – at least from actual review outlets, not Amazon reader reviews – to be at least halfway honest, if not unbiased. But with consumer reviews for electronics, household goods, etc…, I pretty much expect them to be fake in some way. What is more – and I’m probably unique in that – I hardly ever pay any attention to consumer reviews when buying electronics, household appliances, etc… I pay attention to reviews by Stiftung Warentest, but mostly I buy the same brands that I had a good experience with in the past and avoid those brands that I had bad experiences with.

Laura Miller weighs in at Salon with a guide to decoding the range of Amazon reviews of a given book. This article pretty much hits every cliché. Four and five star reviews are inevitably from friends or family of the author or at the very least gushing fans with zero taste, one star reviews are inevitably honest, unless the reviewer slams a book for being too long, too difficult to understand, having unlikable characters and using too many big words. Then the book is good and the reviewer a person with no taste. And as if all that wasn’t cliché enough, Laura Miller also gets in a bonus crack at “vampire romances”, many of which are worse than Fifty Shades of Grey in her exalted opinion. Now I have read a lot of paranormal romance and urban fantasy, including some really bad paranormal romance and urban fantasy. And none of it was worse than Fifty Shades of Grey.

The Atlantic weighs in as well with an article that somehow manages to shift the blame for some dishonest authors buying fake reviews to Amazon and all indie authors. Of course, it’s not just indie authors who pay for fake reviews or post them themselves, as we’ll see further down.

At the New Wave Authors Blog, horror writer Stant Litore and SF write Rob Kroese weigh in on the scandal. Rob Kroese points out that John Locke tricked the Amazon recommendation algorithms with his fake reviews and thus shoehorned his books into popularity lists and recommendation e-mails, while Stant Litore declares that John Locke violated the trust between readers and writers. Litore gets a bit of backlash* for his somewhat hyperbolic language, but I do agree with Litore on the point that there is such a thing as a reader-writer contract. And John Locke certainly violated that contract with his fake reviews.

As for Litore, I filed his comments about “hearts and souls” and “sacred act of reading” under “weird American religion speak”, i.e. the sort of overwrought, semi-religious language that some Americans (and it’s mostly Americans) like to use. That sort of quasi-religious language always strikes me as a bit weird, especially since I am probably the least spiritual person on the planet, but it doesn’t bother me beyond the occasional eyeroll.

However, it seems as if some indies don’t like any hint at all that writing could be art or indeed anything other than entertainment designed to make money. A pity, because the people who criticized Litore’s hyperbolic comments are both very good writers.

Sharon Galligar Chance responds from the POV of a serious book reviewer who actually reads and honestly reviews the books she is assigned. I imagine that this whole fake review practice must be as frustrating for those reviewers who actually take their task seriously.

Meanwhile, another author, British thriller writer R.J. Ellory has been found to have written glowing sockpuppet reviews of his own books. Even worse, Ellory was also found to have written negative sockpuppet reviews of his rivals’ books, many of whom responded to condemn the practice. And just to prove that it’s not just indie authors doing this, Ellory’s novels are published by Orion.

Ellory is not the only sockpuppeteer recently uncovered either. Renown historian British historian Orlando Figes turns out to have posted scathing reviews of the works of academic rivals at Amazon, using the name of his wife. His excuse is really novel, too, for Figes claims that he was so traumatized by his research into Russian gulags that he suffered a breakdown and started posting one star sockpuppet reviews at Amazon.

Also in response to the review blow-up, Robert Jackson Bennett shares the six types of online reviews that drive writers absolutely nuts.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Links | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

More on the paid reviews scandal, John Locke, loyalty transfer and Joe Paterno

By now the New York Times article about a “pay for customer reviews” service that I blogged about yesterday has filtered through the online writing and publishing world, so here are some more responses:

At Self Publishing Review which offers a “pay for review service” similarly to Kirkus (where you pay, but get a thorough review that is not guaranteed to be good), Henry Baum wonders whether the extreme profit and money orientation of some indie writers is not at the root of issues like paying for dishonest reviews and also blames the “get rich quick” mentality peddled by Joe Konrath (who to my knowledge never paid for reviews) and John Locke. As for me, I’m wondering whether Henry Baum is not Paul Jessup (who has nothing to say on this latest scandal yet) in disguise.

At Terrible Minds, Chuck Wendig agrees that the behaviour of John Locke and others who pay for reviews is a little scummy, but that it doesn’t really concern him. He also cautions authors other against bringing out the pitchforks, because mobs armed with torches and pitchforks never changed anything. I actually agree with his last point. But the biggest culprits of pitchwork wielding mob behaviour are not found in the indie community.

At Salon, Erin Keane writes that indie writers should uphold community standards and come down hard on stuff like paying for reviews. Otherwise, readers might start to believe that assertions like Sue Grafton’s recent complaint that indie authors are lazy do have a point.

Of course, plenty of people already believe that most four and five star reviews on indie books are from friends and family or otherwise fake. This is also the point that K.W. Jeter makes in his take on the whole issue.

K.W. Jeter also goes a bit into John Locke’s supposed marketing and sales tactics and wonders how well Locke’s infamous “Why I love Joe Paterno and my Mom post” actually worked. The post still is online BTW, if you want to read it again, though the URL has changed.

Like I said in the previous post, I actually had a blogpost go viral last year and it did diddly squat for sales. Now my viral post was not exactly a carefully designed loyalty transfer post, it was just something that struck a chord through no fault of my own.

Can loyalty transfer work? I guess it can. I have bought books based on author’s clever comments on favourite TV shows, comics or a dozen other things online. I’ve also not bought books because the author has trashed a book or film or TV show I loved online, so it works both ways.

The strangest thing about all this is that until John Locke started extolling his loyalty transfer post about Joe Paterno as the way to make sales, I had never heard of Joe Paterno. Indeed, my first reaction to that post was “Who the fuck is Joe Paterno?” By the time the scandal hit, Joe Paterno was “the guy from that John Locke post” to me.

During the discussion about John Locke`s marketing methods, I joked that I would have to write my John Locke copycat loyalty transfer post about Otto Rehhagel or Thomas Schaaf, which would be a massive problem, because neither is all that well known outside Germany. Never mind that I don’t think that Werder Bremen fans will necessarily enjoy my books, though the editor who bought two of the previously published stories in Heartache and Murder in the Family is a huge Werder fan.

However, the real takeaway from the whole “loyalty transfer” concept is be interesting and blog about something other than yourself or your books once in a while. It doesn’t really matter whether that something other is Joe Paterno or Werder Bremen or Misfits or Game of Thrones or something else entirely.

For example, I would probably never have started watching Criminal Minds, if not for Elizabeth Bear’s recaps, which made a show of which I’d only seen one or two episodes seem a lot more interesting than it had looked on screen. Now how many fans of Criminal Minds went the other way round and found Elizabeth Bear’s blog via her Criminal Minds recaps and went on to buy her books? On the other hand, I always skip over Elizabeth Bear’s rockclimbing posts, because I have zero interest in rockclimbing. But how many rockclimbing enthusiasts have found her blog via those posts?

So in short, loyalty transfer can work on a person by person basis, though it’s not a magic bullet. And your enthusiasm should be genuine rather than faked just in order to drum up interest in your books.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bookselling, Links | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

“How I sold one million e-books…” revisited

First of all, Heartache is the featured new release at the Short Story Blog today.

In other news, the New York Times published a lengthy article about a “pay for fake e-book reviews” service. One of the service’s patrons was non other than John Locke, he of How I sold 1 million e-books fame.

Now paying for reviews is frowned upon in indie publishing circles. Nonetheless, John Locke is certainly not the only successful indie author who has paid for reviews. Darcie Chan, bestselling author of The Mill River Recluse, also paid for a review, albeit from Kirkus, which is considered respectable. And British indie thriller author Stephen Leather was recently revealed to have used sockpuppets to review his own books (which is also frowned upon). Steve Mosby has more here, here and here.

Steve Mosby also goes a bit into the recent revelations about John Locke in this post and wonders what to do about dodgy practices.

Meanwhile, Russell Blake wonders whether an article in a high profile paper like the New York Times focusing on the dodgy practices of some indie author isn’t a clever hatchet job attacking the whole indie community. He might have a point there, since the New York Times hasn’t exact proven itself friendly to indies in the past, e.g. by omitting indies from bestseller lists until it became impossible to do so.

In this light, it’s also interesting to revisit John Locke’s How I sold 1 million e-books… (here’s a thorough if critical review, if you want to spare yourself buying and reading the book) about a year after it was first published. John Locke has somewhat faded from public view in recent times to be supplanted by newer indie writer stars such as E.L. James or Jamie McGuire (bookwise, I’d rather have Locke). So time to see what has remained of Locke’s marketing advice in a changed marketplace.

Now John Locke never mentions having paid for reviews, probably because the practice has been frowned upon for a long time now. His advice extends mainly to determining the ideal demographic for your books and employing social media to target that demographic on Twitter and by writing so-called “loyalty transfer” posts, i.e. blogging about your emotional connection to a celebrity or popular cause. Now John Locke’s example post, Why I love Joe Paterno and my Mom, is no longer online, probably because celebrated American football coach has recently fallen from grace, having been found to have looked away while his assistant sexually abused children. Now to be fair, John Locke had no way of knowing that Paterno would fall from grace within months of that post. I still think he should have left it up, perhaps with a “Well, I didn’t know then what we know now and of course I’m appalled” note. As for whether blog posts that go viral sell books – well, I had a post of mine go viral last year and it didn’t influence sales at all.

As for John Locke’s advice to use Twitter to persuade people to check out your books, well, it may have worked for him, but even since he gave away his “secret” last year and everyone has been doing it, Twitter has not just become all but unusable for book promotion but also for regular users who sometimes have trouble having conversations without being spammed to death by “Buy my book” posts from eager Locke acolytes.

So with Twitter rendered useless and posts extolling Joe Paterno suddenly becoming politically incorrect (and I noticed very few new posts on Locke’s blog – only three since the start of the year), the gist of what remains of his advice is determining your ideal reader and targeting your books to this ideal reader. And indeed many other indies echo this bit of advice and it’s probably sound as well.

Nonetheless, I have never determined my target demographic beyond people who like what I write. Part of the reason is that the first time I came across a quote of “I only write for X people, not for Y people” in an author interview, I was appalled, especially since I was a part of the Y demographic (I didn’t like the book either and only read it for university, so the author was probably right), because why would any author deliberately exclude potential readers? So I decided I would write potentially write for everybody and let the readers decide for themselves.

Besides, it’s not as if the cultural industry is very good at determining target demographics anyway. Supernatural was originally conceived as a show to appeal to the coveted young male demographic. Anybody who has spent any time at all in the online fanfic world knows how completely mistaken that was.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bookselling, Links | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Indie publishing, Politics and the Future of the Novel

Kristine Kathryn Rusch offers a brilliant take on Ewan Morrison’s screed that there will be no more professional writers in the future. I already skewered that particular missive by Mr Morrison here. If Morrison keeps this up, he’ll need his own tag.

There’s also a shoutout to the Book View Café and bonus potshots at Scott Turow and China Miéville for his recent speech at the Edinburgh Writer’s Festival about the future of the novel.

Now I can totally understand taking potshots at Scott Turow, because he is an easy target, has never met anybody’s definition for a professional writer (he’s a lawyer who writes on the side – good for him) and I never liked Presumed Innocent in the first place. Harrison Ford and Greta Scacchi doing it on that desk in the film version still sits in my personal top 10 of least appealing sex scenes.

But I don’t really understand why China Miéville’s speech was so controversial, because Miéville actually comes out pro-ebook, pro-indie, pro-genre, pro-fanfiction and anti-DRM in his speech. He’s no doomsaying Ewan Morrison, indeed he seems to be in accordance with many indie writers in many points. Continue reading

Send to Kindle
Posted in Links, Publishing | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

New Collection Available: Heartache and some e-reader news

First of all, Amazon has opened a Kindle store in India, though it seems to be a special section of Amazon.com rather than a standalone website like e.g. Amazon.de or Amazon.fr. Nonetheless, Indian readers are now able to buy e-books at Amazon.com without having to pay the 2 US-dollar international surcharge.

This week has also seen the news that US-retailer Barnes & Noble (which shuns Non-American customers and indie authors) will finally be taking its Nook e-reader and the related store international, starting in the UK, though I for one am not holding my breath.

Finally, I have an announcement of my own to make, because I have a new collection of three short stories of broken hearts and love gone wrong available. The collection is entitled Heartache and among other things, it also includes my first ever published short story, available for the first time again since 1996 (the issue of newleaf wherein it was first published has long been sold out).

HeartacheThree tales of broken hearts and love gone wrong

Matt was the great love of Lydia’s young life. But how can she possible survive, knowing that he loves another, that red-headed bitch Jeannie?

They got their happy ending, the white wedding, the house, the suburban life together. But every morning when he leaves for work, she secretly hopes he won’t come back.

Three years ago, A.J. and Diane were a couple. It didn’t work out and Diane grew a hard shell around her wounded heart and adopted a new tough personality to survive. But when she runs into A.J. at a wedding party, the past comes crashing back all at once.

For more information, visit the dedicated Heartache page.

Buy it for the low price of 0.99 USD, EUR or GBP
at Amazon US, Amazon UK, Amazon Germany, Amazon France, Amazon Spain, Amazon Italy, Kobo, DriveThruFiction, OmniLit/AllRomance ebooks and XinXii.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Announcements, E-Readers | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sue Grafton, Ewan Morrison and the latest indie publishing uproars

Mystery author Sue Grafton caused a minor uproar in indie publishing land, when she called self-publishing “the lazy option” in an interview with the Louisville Gazette, her hometown paper. The original interview is here and here is the relevant quote:

Do you have any words of wisdom for young writers?

Quit worrying about publication and master your craft. If you have a good story to tell and if you write it well, the Universe will come to your aid. Don’t self-publish. That’s as good as admitting you’re too lazy to do the hard work.

The interviewer, like any good journalist should, tackled the subject again and specifically asked Ms. Grafton about indie success stories like Jon Locke’s who’s also from Louisville apparently. Ms. Grafton replied as follows:

If so, what hard work are indie success stories too lazy to complete?

Is it possible that indie publishing is more effective than querying agents & publishers, for the new writer? More and more agents and publishers seem to be treating indie books as the new slush pile.

Good questions. Obviously, I’m not talking about the rare few writers who manage to break out. The indie success stories aren’t the rule. They’re the exception. The self-published books I’ve read are often amateurish. I’ve got one sitting on my desk right now and I’ve received hundreds of them over the years. Sorry about that, but it’s the truth. The hard work is taking the rejection, learning the lessons, and mastering the craft over a period of time. I see way too many writers who complete one novel and start looking for the fame and fortune they’re sure they’re entitled to. To me, it seems disrespectful…that a ‘wannabe’ assumes it’s all so easy s/he can put out a ‘published novel’ without bothering to read, study, or do the research. Learning to construct a narrative and create character, learning to balance pace, description, exposition, and dialogue takes a long time. This is not an quick do-it-yourself home project. Self-publishing is a short cut and I don’t believe in short cuts when it comes to the arts. I compare self-publishing to a student managing to conquer Five Easy Pieces on the piano and then wondering if s/he’s ready to be booked into Carnegie Hall. Don’t get me started. Oops…you already did.

SF writer Hugh Howey, who is one of the big indie success stories, responds to Sue Grafton on his blog. For a good laugh, check out his four favourite Sue Grafton novels.

Apparently, Sue Grafton was somewhat overwhelmed by having the full fury of the indie publishing movement directed at her and so she offered a follow-up/retraction at the Louisville Gazette a few days later.

The Sue Grafton uproar as well as Hugh Howey’s response are also addressed in this surprisingly good and balanced article about the indie versus traditional publishing debate at Forbes with some background information on the developments in the US publishing industry in the past twenty to thirty years. Found via Robert Bidinotto.

Finally, the New York Times offers an overview about self-publishing services and tools. Oddly enough they forgot Kindle Direct Publishing a.k.a. KDP, though they do mention Createspace.

Finally, our friend Ewan Morrison is at it again. I already skewered his predilection for articles about the end of literature and western culture as we know it here, here, here and here. Now Mr. Morrison has aimed his critical gaze at fanfiction – and considering that he considers indie publishing the end of culture and literature as we know it, one cannot help but wonder what he will think of fanfic, provided the really disturbingly kinky slash doesn’t burn out his brain first.

The Guardian article starts out as one might have imagine:

If you were to lock a group of pop culture junkies and TV addicts in a bunker, tell them that the end of the world had arrived and that they had to preserve culture for posterity by writing books, what they would produce would be fan fiction (fanfic). This is actually the plot of a piece of fanfic from the 1950s, in which sci-fi fans survive Armageddon and rebuild civilisation in their own image. It may seem like a joke, but for many the rise of fanfic is “the end of the world”. Fanfic is seen as the lowest point we’ve reached in the history of culture – it’s crass, sycophantic, celebrity-obsessed, naive, badly written, derivative, consumerist, unoriginal – anti-original. From this perspective it’s a disaster when a work of fanfic becomes the world’s number one bestseller and kickstarts a global trend.

However, once the comment bait is out of the way, Morrison actually provides a pretty decent overview over the history of fanfic. He does have some silly things to say about the popularity of slash in all its variations:

There is a dark sexual undercurrent to the majority of fanfic, as if on a subconscious level the fan actually resents the control that their idol or idealised character has over their life. Through the act of writing fanfic, and subjecting characters to compulsive or vengeful love, sex, S&M or rape, the fan then regains control.

And of course, Mr Morrison can’t quite resist his usual doom and gloom predictions:

So what happens to culture when fanfic becomes the dominant economic model in publishing and the leader in cultural values – is that even possible? Surely derivative works have to be derived from something “original”. With Fifty Shades this ceases to be the case, and, as we have seen, fanfic offers many tools for recycling (AU, crossover, mashup, self-insert, Mary Sue, the 12 varieties of slash etc) which takes the recombination of texts into the exponential. It is possible that with the enchanted duplication systems of fan-based epub, we might have arrived at a point in history where we’ve accumulated enough cultural material from the past for fans to remix indefinitely, and as they can now sell this content to each other this becomes a boom industry where none existed before. However, the point where fans become the creators, and a derivative work becomes the new original is also the point at which the culture industries stop needing to create anything new. Fanfic begets fanfic, which then in turn becomes mainstream which then begets further fanfic and so on. When we reach that point our future will not be fifty, but fifty thousand, shades of grey.

Still, compared to Ewan Morrison’s previous articles, this one is surprisingly measured.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Links, Publishing, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

New Collection Available: Murder in the Family

I have a new e-book out, which also marks Pegasus Pulp’s first foray into the crime genre.

Murder in the Family is a collection of nine short crime stories in the style of the “abgeschlossene Kurzkrimis” (self-contained crime shorts) that used to be found (and still are on occasion) in the backpages of German magazines.

Murder in the FamilyNine tales of love, death, vengeance and murder.

He got to keep the minivan, but lost the family he bought it for. But sometimes, murder is a cheaper solution than divorce…

A travelling salesman vanishes, leaving behind a wife, two children, countless lonely housewives and his hat floating in a stream. But what really happened to Jack Bryce?

A foundling, a newborn, abandoned and left to die. But tonight, he will have his revenge on the parents who deserted him. Tonight, they will pay, at the very place where the story once began, at Lovers’ Ridge…

Thirty years ago Jimmy Donnelly was sent to prison. Now he’s free again and eager to finally avenge himself on the man who put him behind bars. But thirty years is a long time. And sometimes, it’s too late for vengeance.

You don’t want to owe a favour to the mafia, especially not when the boss himself comes to collect. But what could a hairdresser possibly have to offer to the mob?

Jack Slater is the worst sort of criminal scum, a pursesnatcher who hangs out on cemeteries to relieve old ladies of their handbags. But when he snatches Eudora Pennington’s purse, Jack gets more than he bargained for.

She’d seen something she shouldn’t have. He was commanding of the death squad sent to eliminate her. But one look into each others’ eyes changed both their lives…

Peter Simmons was a man of roaming hands, who wouldn’t take “no” for an answer, a man who took whatever he wants, whether it’s cookies from a jar or the single Mom who moved in next door. But sometimes, getting caught with a hand in the wrong cookie jar can be deadly…

Waiting for your boyfriend to finally come home from work can be hell, especially if it’s your anniversary and you suspect he forgot – again. But does the ringing of the doorbell promise roses and sex and the long overdue proposal or something far more sinister?

A collection of nine short crime tales of 18800 words altogether.

Warning: This is a collection of crime stories, so there will be murder, death, sexual harassment, bad words and assorted other unpleasantness involved.

For more information, visit the dedicated Murder in the Family page.

Buy it for the low price of 3.99 USD, EUR or 2.99 GBP at Amazon US, Amazon UK, Amazon Germany, Amazon France, Amazon Spain, Amazon Italy, Kobo, DriveThruFiction, OmniLit/AllRomance ebooks and XinXii.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Announcements, Books | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

More publishing doom and gloom, another bestseller and July sales figures

Ewan Morrison, self-proclaimed doomsayer of the imminent death of literature, publishing and Western culture as we know it, is at it again and informs us at the Guardian that social media does not sell books (he does have a point there) and that self-publishing is a bubble that will burst within the next 18 months. Mind you, he already that the very same thing (minus social media references) last year. I blogged about Mr Morrison’s previous predictions of doom here, here and here.

Meanwhile, Ewan Morrison’s doomsayings were also quoted in this article at the Toronto Globe & Mail along with similar predictions of the imminent death of the professional writer by Scott Turow and the chairwoman of the Writer’s Union of Canada. The Globe & Mail article was picked apart at various indie publishing sites and blogs, not entirely without justification. However, the line that most commenters seem to pick on was one that struck me as probably the least controversial bit in the whole article, namely this quote by Ewan Morrison: Continue reading

Send to Kindle
Posted in Bookselling, Links, Metrics, Publishing | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

More on the New Pulp Fiction

The New Pulp Fiction discussion (my previous two entries can be found here and here) is still going on.

At Do Some Damage, Brian Lindenmuth divides the new pulp fictioneers into two camps, one camp which writes new stories in the mode of the old pulps, i.e. pulp pastiches, and one camp which writes a lot of fiction across various genres in the spirit of the pulps, but does not necessarily imitate the pulps per se. Lindenmuth is not so much a fan of the former, but obviously admires the latter.

That said, Brian Lindenmuth makes two points in his post that are frequently forgotten in all of those discussions of old and new pulp: First of all, he points out that pulp fiction is usually viewed as a (white) American phenomenon, even though there have been (and in some cases still are) variations of pulp fiction in many cultures. Brian Lindenmuth mentions Hindi pulp fiction and Holloway House, which seems to have been a company specializing in pulpy crime fiction aimed at African Americans (now owned by Kensington). And of course in Germany, we still have “Romanhefte” which are our answer (quite literally in the early years) to America’s pulp fiction, namely 64-page digest sized magazines printed on woodpulp paper with a glossy magazine stock cover, which normally contain a single novelette. “Romanhefte” come in various genres. Romance (with the subgenres medical, aristocratic, gothic, mommy and family, mountains and Heimat) and western are the most popular, but there also are horror, crime and detective, science fiction, fantasy and war “Romanhefte”. And though they’re no longer as popular as they once were, they still exist. And not just in Germany either, I’ve seen “Romanheft” type fiction magazines (some of them translated from German) in French, Italian, Croatian and Slovenian.

The second important point that Brian Lindenmuth makes is that we often have a distorted image of the golden age of the American pulps nowadays, because only the best authors and stories have been reprinted over and over, while the vast mediocre majority of pulp fiction (let alone the really bad stuff) has been forgotten. E-publishing is bringing some of those forgotten works back into focus, but nonetheless many people forget that pulp fiction was not just Robert E. Howard and H.P. Lovecraft, Dashiell Hammett and Raymond Chandler, Isaac Asimov and Philip K. Dick.

Meanwhile, Chuck Wendig attempts to define New Pulp at Terrible Minds. He identifies five characteristics, namely that New Pulp refuses to be confined to only one genre or subgenre, that it has more of a literary and poetic sensibility than the old pup, that it is about writing and publishing fast, that its writers have a craftsmen work ethic and that it defines definition. Those are all very good points and I agree with them all.

And what about my own work? How does that fit into this New Pulp movement, provided there is such a thing?

Well, Brian Lindenmuth would certainly file the Silencer stories under his first camp, those who write more or less slavish imitations of classic pulp fiction. And that’s okay, because I did write the Silencer stories in imitation of the hero pulps of the 1930s, just as I wrote The Other Side of the Curtain as an homage to the golden age of spy fiction in the 1960s. I liked those genres, styles and periods and I wanted to play with them. And I don’t think there’s anything wrong with playing with the tropes and forms and genres and even the settings of another era for a while. It may get a bit dull, if you never do anything else, but for a story or three? Why the hell not?

Besides, I don’t write just Silencer stories or 1960ish spy fiction or spicy historicals or whatever. I write in all those genres and more. Indeed, one of the reasons why I was not more adamant in submitting my first completed novel Colfrith (coming to an e-reader near you sometime soon, I promise) to agents and publishers was that I was afraid of having to write the same thing over and over again, should that one be published. And while Colfrith was a Steampunk Regency Romance, my next project Prisoners of Amaymon was science fiction (I should really finish that one someday) and the third with a very rude working title that I’ll probably have to change upon publication was a contemporary romance among geeks. I like many genres and subgenres and I could never settle on just one. And this is why indie publishing has been a god-send for me. Because it allows me to write whatever the hell I like.

As for the other points Chuck Wendig makes, I like to think that I have a literary sensibility of sorts (hey, it’s right there in the tagline), though I can’t write poetic unless writing poetry (and sometimes not even then – I’m rather hopeless as a poet) and any attempt at lyrical writing usually quickly descends into parody*. Am I fast? Well, I could be faster, but considering that I have managed to publish 18 e-books in the space of a single year, I’d say that I’m fast enough. Work ethic? Well, I’d never describe myself as a hard worker, but I do shoot for at least 1000 words a day and I’ve been exceeding that daily minimum for several months now. I view any writing income as a nice extra, but that was a conscious decision, so I would never be forced to stick with a bad contract, because I couldn’t afford to walk away.

So do I write New Pulp Fiction? Yes, I guess I do. At least, when I feel like it.

*I have a hilarious New Weird/Mythpunk/stuff that wins genre wards parody on my harddrive that will likely never see the light of day, because it attacks too many sacred cows of the genre community.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Books, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Pegasus Pulp e-books now available at Kobo

Canadian e-book retailer Kobo finally opened its Writing Life portal to the public today, which means that you can now buy all of my e-books at Kobo as well.

So if you own a Kobo e-reader, want to avoid the Amazon international surcharge or need another place to buy in epub format, check it out.

And whoever keeps googling for “Kobo Pegasus” will hopefully find what he or she is looking for, too.

Here is the link to all my books. Individual links can be found at the respective book pages.

Send to Kindle
Posted in Announcements, Bookselling | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment